PGP Logo   Header Image  
username:
password:
 
 
News
Toys
Video Games
Movies
Reviews
Features
Articles
Media
Links
About
Contact
 
Peter Cullen
 
Search Archives

 
Archives
December 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
July 2016
December 2015
February 2015
December 2014
June 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
April 2001
 
Toughest Man in the World
 
Featured Links
16bit.com
Cool Toy Review
Toplessrobot.com
Final Girl
Fans of Pheyden
Retro Treasures
 
 
Nanowrimo
download novel
 
 
 
 

The finer points of automatic weapons

After many years of tinkeing with them in video games and RPGs today I went to a range and rented some automatic weapons and used them. I operated a Thompson M1A1, a M2 carbine,and a HK G3. My thoughts:
 
Thompson M1A1:
The Thompson M1A1 has sights that are pretty imprecise compared to what I'm used to, i.e. modern factory default pistol sights. The rear sight was a huge ring and it seems like it was designed just for quick sight pictures using the front sights. What's more is that it recoiled quite a lot. The range staff member advised me to aim low and even while I had my sights pointed at the bottom of my target paper the actual bullet holes climbed upwards all over the paper. And that's just with me squeezing off bursts of 2-4 rounds and leaning forward to compensate for recoil. I should point out that I'm not a tiny guy; I weight between 190 and 200 pounds, I'm 5'11", and I've been hitting the gym every other day on average. This is actually pretty different than the impression I'd gained from playing lots of video games. In the first place, I can't imagine anything useful coming from spraying in full auto with the M1A1 for anything more than a 2-4 round burst. I feel that the barrel would just get too off target and you'd end up spraying at everything and nothing in particular at the same time. Secondly, the sights look pretty useless for anything besides for close range shooting. Without tight rear sights to help me align the weapon, I don't feel like I'd be able to hit the black on a 50 foot competition target like I'm able to do with a contemporary pistol with factory default sights if I aim carefully and take like 5+ seconds per shot. In other words, if I were trying to shoot very accurately at a longer distance at this time I'd feel more comfortable with a pistol on account of the sights than I would with the M1A1 even with its longer barrel.
 
M2 Carbine: Initially I'd really wanted to try a M1 carbine for a long time so as to get my Vietnam groove on, but the M2 available for rental had full auto fire so I guess that's just a bit of extra value to my shooting experience. The M2 was a lot easier to control than the M1A1 and the sights were better too. I still went all over the paper, though, but to a lesser extent than with the M1A1, and of course the .30 carbine cartridges have smaller bullets than .45 ACP cartridges. So, basically, even though on the whole written history usually is dealing with how people didn't like carbines in .30, my hunch is that I'd personally feel more capable of hitting something far away with it than I would if I had a M1A1.
 
HKG3: My first assault rifle in 7.62 NATO! I fired the first few rounds in semi automatic mode just to get the full experience, and switched to full auto later. My comment was, "Holy moly!" The recoil was a lot worse than the M1A1. It was just insane trying to control it in burst mode. I can now understand why when you read history and war memoirs full auto with the M14 is so maligned. At least from a standing position I can't imagine how full auto in 7.62 can stay remotely on target after the first 3 rounds or so. Of course, being a HK product this was probably the "best" weapon I handled today. It was the most comfortable to handle, the most erogonomic, had the best sights, and was probably the most accurate. I'm actually really happy that I finally was able to experience the infamous 7.62-NATO-full-auto-while-standing. :)
 
On the whole, even realistic-style or simulationist-style video games seem to make guns, and automatic fire, more accurate than they are in reality. My recent experience with the G3, for example, convinces me that not only would every round fired in automatic mode while standing with a weapon chambered in 7.62 NATO past the third be a waste, but that the weapon would also get dangerously out of control because of the barrel being perturbed so much. I suppose that explains why when machine guns in 7.62 NATO are used for suppressive fire they're weighted down with sandbags or mounted on tripods. However, in games, it's pretty ubiquitous that long full auto discharges even from weapons chambered in 7.62 NATO are a very controllable and effective tactic even when the player character is standing. The reality versus the video game portrayal of the M1A1 is now especially amusing to me. I'd been under the strong impression from games such as Call of Duty and Return to Castle Wolfenstien that the M1A1 was fantastically accurate at long range. But the first thought in my head as I fired the M1A1 in reality was "this is strictly for CQB" on account of the sights being so crude and the automatic fire being so difficult to control. Even if I were crouching or prone and squeezing off single shots, I don't feel confident that I'd be accurate at 50 feet or more with the M1A1 just on account of my being uncomfortable with the sights
 
-- Wounded Ronin (4/01/2008)
 

 
 
 
Featured Toy Lines

Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure

Air Raiders

GI Joe: 30 for 30

Transformers: Prime - Beast Hunters (2013)

Masters of the Universe Classics

Batman: The Brave and the Bold

Nasta Reactors

DC Universe Classics

Indiana Jones by Hasbro

New Additions
TurboGrafx 16 - Lord of The Sword
Lord of The Sword
for SMS
 
GoBots - Royal-T
Egon
w/ Symmetrical Book Stacking

Conventions

Toy Fair 2017 

Toy Fair 2016 

Toy Fair 2014 

Toy Fair 2013 

Toy Fair 2012 

Toy Fair 2011 

Toy Fair 2010 

Toy Fair 2009 

Toy Fair 2008 

New York Comic Con 2008 

San Diego Comic Con 2008 

 
© 2017 ParryGamePreserve